Abduction for Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 365 A & 377 kidnapping or valuable security of property, etc., sodomy bell, allegedly ransomring a 13-year-old boy with his accomplice accused Was kidnapped on the charge of. Driving through evidence was available to show that the accused was not an easy driver of the said vehicle, but rather that he knew of the kidnapping of a minor boy and that he was sharing information with his co-accused, after the incident. The conduct of the accused was avoided by the police for nine days, it was also related that in medical evidence, the commission of the sodomy offense relating to the abductor was indicated in his statement under section 161, c. The RPC specifically called the accused and his co-accused in the vehicle responsible for the forced abduction of the accused. Substances enough to record the material was available to the accused was denied bail bail conditions
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011