Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD EJAZ versus STATE


Abduction for Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 365 A & 377 kidnapping or valuable security of property, etc., sodomy bell, allegedly ransomring a 13-year-old boy with his accomplice accused Was kidnapped on the charge of. Driving through evidence was available to show that the accused was not an easy driver of the said vehicle, but rather that he knew of the kidnapping of a minor boy and that he was sharing information with his co-accused, after the incident. The conduct of the accused was avoided by the police for nine days, it was also related that in medical evidence, the commission of the sodomy offense relating to the abductor was indicated in his statement under section 161, c. The RPC specifically called the accused and his co-accused in the vehicle responsible for the forced abduction of the accused. Substances enough to record the material was available to the accused was denied bail bail conditions

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
criminal advocate from Padidan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.