Section 2302 (b) was not proven by the definition of convicted AMD evidence, sudden provocation by the accused, and a reduction in the specific request for self-defense, as required by Article 121 of the 1984 Act 1984; And according to his own testimony, he filed an FIR with a special character, specifically listed immediately, to refute the charge made under section 404040 (?). I was nominated, the ocular testimony was permanent, straight forward and there was no material contradiction or contradiction. In this case, the personal perpetrators or wrongful desires to make false allegations in the case and they explained the reason for their presence at the time of the incident, the evidence of the prosecution was dependable and the medical evidence confirmed that the theft. Along with the recovery of the chemicals, there were positive reports from chemicals and serologists. Support for the trial version or the defendant's deduction in favor of the accused, because he acted in provocation of his mother at the time of the incident, the accused was 23/24 years old and under the influence of his co-accused parent. Its action cannot be dismissed under certain circumstances. In this case, the death sentence of the accused was changed to life imprisonment
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
