Find a Lawyer

AMEER ABDULLAH KHAN versus D.P.O., MIANWALI

Section 365 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 22A & 22B Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Abduction or detention of someone secretly and wrongly accused of keeping someone in prison After the report was prepared, the police became a Factories Officer and did not reopen the case. The FIR / Supplementary Statement was specifically designated as a charge of litigation at any time. Was not presented to the magistrate who did not dismiss / dismiss the complaint which is still being investigated concerning the facts of the matter. An inquiry was called that could not take this action. The High Court did not interfere with the legal duty of the police to investigate an offense in its constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. SECRETARY 2011 YLR 392
• NAJJAN BIBI v. State 2011 MLD 392
• NAZIR AHMAD v. A.S.J. 2011 PCrLJ 396
• Haji MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. Ch. ABDUL MA NNAN 2011 CLC 396
• RUKHSANA KAUSAR v. B.V.H. 2011 PLC(CS) 398
• ABDUL JABBAR v. State 2011 YLR 402
• ALLIED BANK LTD. v. DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE) 2011 PLD 402
• Dr. MUHAMMAD PARVEZ IQBAL QAZI v. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, ISLAMABAD 2011 PLC(CS) 403

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

criminal advocate from Khanpur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes