Find a Lawyer

ABDUL JABBAR versus STATE

A grant of 700 grams of hashish was recovered from the possession of Section 497 Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (B) and 51 of the accused and could be prosecuted under Section 9 (B). Is. The Control of the Narcotic Substances Act 1997, which did not fall under the prohibition contained in Section 51 of the Narcotic Substances Act 1997, had been behind bars for the past four months and police did not need further investigation. The case is appropriate. In order to approve the bail, the accused was admitted on bail, under the circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• NAZIR AHMAD v. A.S.J. 2011 PCrLJ 396
• Haji MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. Ch. ABDUL MA NNAN 2011 CLC 396
• AMEER ABDULLAH KHAN v. D.P.O., MIANWALI 2011 MLD 398
• RUKHSANA KAUSAR v. B.V.H. 2011 PLC(CS) 398
• ALLIED BANK LTD. v. DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE) 2011 PLD 402
• Dr. MUHAMMAD PARVEZ IQBAL QAZI v. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, ISLAMABAD 2011 PLC(CS) 403
• ARSHAD ALI v. MUSHTAQ AHMAD 2011 YLR 404
• JAVED IQBAL v. ADDITIONAL INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE 2011 PCrLJ 405

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

best advocate from Mustang lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes