SYEDA SAMEERA AKHLAQ versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT, LAHORE
Section 5 and Schedule Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application for custody of the minor and the care of the wife and the trial court permits interim rehabilitation of Rs 20,000 of the minor but no order regarding rehabilitation by the plaintiff / spouse is approved. The wife claimed that after the chairman, the arbitration council rejected the divorce notice, she was entitled to a restitution allowance while the rehabilitation granted to the minor was not in accordance with the plaintiff's / father's financial status, regarding legal status. The trial court did not pass an order regarding the care of the defendant in view of her husband's statement. That she divorced her plaintiff's husband, despite the amount of her salary paid by the plaintiff, she did not present any evidence of defendant's financial status in the Family Court or in the High Court Judge, Family Court. What, correctly submitted the interim maintenance order that can later be amended without affecting the applicant's constitutional request \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
