Find a Lawyer

BASHARAT ALI KHAN versus MUHAMMAD AKBAR

After an unlawful trial against the Section 13 lawsuit pre-discrimination, the appellate court accepted the appeal, and the prosecutor, despite knowing that the prosecutor had knowledge of selling the malicious verdict after three months, Told the story and lied. Plaintiff's position regarding receipt of a sales notice and making a disclosure statement is false cannot be relied upon by statements of witnesses who reside in the vicinity of the suit land, may receive immediate sale failure Is. Property that was very beneficial for the success of the pre-arrest possession trial, rejecting the decision of the plaintiff, was not entitled to an unclean decree and the trial court's order was upheld. n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• MUHAMMAD SALEEM v. TAHIR ALI QURESHI 2011 CLC 961
• HABIB BANK LIMITED v. AZAM MAJEED 2011 CLD 963
• AFZAL KHAN v. A.S.J., SHEIKHUPURA 2011 YLR 963
• Syeda SAMEERA AKHLAQ v. JUDGE FAMILY COURT, LAHORE 2011 MLD 964
• SARDAR ZAHEER AHMAD KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PAKISTAN 2011 PCrLJ 973
• SARDAR ZAHEER AHMAD KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PAKISTAN 2011 PCrLJ 973
• SHEIKHAN WALA CITIZEN COMMUNITY, KHANEWAL v. EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT) KHANEWAL 2011 CLC 976
• KHAIRAT HUSSAIN v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, SHEIKHUPURA 2011 YLR 979

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

patent advocate from Sadiqabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes