Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISMAIL ALIAS GOGA versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) the trustee of the testimony appreciated the evidence that the eyewitness had no reason to falsely impersonate and convict the real culprit with no prior prejudice or enmity. Nevertheless, the FIR lodged immediately ended. At the request of the accused, the recovery of both pistols was proved by independent witnesses, a report by the Franzik Science Laboratory positively alleging that he was firing at the victim with both pistols, with no weakness or lack of purpose. In the diminishing circumstances, the accused fired at least fourteen with two pistols that showed deep hatred and hatred toward him. The casualties and the number of injuries to the victim showed the brutality and brutality in which he was killed. The brutal murder of the victim was not proven by the accused on record.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• KHALIL-UR-REHMAN alias GUDOO v. State 2011 MLD 1088
• Sardar MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB 2011 YLR 1089
• TANVEER SPINNING AND WEAVING MILLS v. GOVENRMENT OF PUNJAB 2011 PTD 1090
• SAJID ALI v. TEHSILDAR 2011 YLR 1092
• TARIQ GULZAR COTTON INDUSTRIES v. ALI ZAIB KHAN TRADERS 2011 YLR 1097
• Sayyed HANAN KHALID GILLANI v. DISTRICT JUDGE/PRESIDING OFFICER, DISTRICT CONSUMER COURT, MULTAN 2011 CLD 1105
• AAMER MEHMOOD HUSSAIN v. NAEHA AAMER SAYED 2011 MLD 1105
• MUHAMMAD JAMSHED alias PERVEZ v. State 2011 YLR 1110

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

property advocates from Qazi Ahmed lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes