Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD JAMSHED ALIAS PERVEZ versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) appreciates the value of the evidence and the presence of eyewitnesses on the occasion was established at the crucial time. According to the incident, the accused had killed the victim. Medical evidence has been made in full credible accounts. Was confirmed. Directly contradicting and not verifying medical evidence was investigated by the investigating officer, and the defense's request was after a deliberate attempt to avoid the outcome of the killing, so the prosecution remained, however, proved Failed to do so and was not sure what had happened between the parties prior to the incident. The death sentence of the accused was reduced to life imprisonment.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• MUHAMMAD ISMAIL alias GOGA v. State 2011 MLD 1092
• TARIQ GULZAR COTTON INDUSTRIES v. ALI ZAIB KHAN TRADERS 2011 YLR 1097
• Sayyed HANAN KHALID GILLANI v. DISTRICT JUDGE/PRESIDING OFFICER, DISTRICT CONSUMER COURT, MULTAN 2011 CLD 1105
• AAMER MEHMOOD HUSSAIN v. NAEHA AAMER SAYED 2011 MLD 1105
• SHAFQAT HUSSAIN v. S.H.O. POLICE STATION TOBA TEK SINGH 2011 PCrLJ 1112
• Malik MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY 2011 CLC 1117
• MAXI INC. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2011 PTD 1117
• TARIQ MEHMOOD v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Education, Lahore 2011 PLC(CS) 1120

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

jobs for advocates from Sehar Baqlas lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes