SAYYED HANAN KHALID GILLANI versus DISTRICT JUDGE/PRESIDING OFFICER, DISTRICT CONSUMER COURT, MULTAN
Section 2 (0, 25 and 28 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application Word / Animal Supply Claims Claims Relating to Supplying Poultry Between Parties) The User alleges that the Supplier has provided it with Grade \ A the girls were not provided. The claim submitted by the consumers under section 28 of the Punjab Consumer Protection Act 2005 was found to be enforceable by the consumer court endorsement of the Consumer Protection Act, 2005, by word / animal. Therefore, the birds added the same thing and the agreement reached between the consumer and the supplier for the supply of the batch did not mean the supply of any product, the High Court approved the trial court order and the Punjab. Claim Protection Act, 2005 submitted by the consumer under Section 28 of the Consumer was not enforceable Applications were denied in circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
