Find a Lawyer

AAMER MEHMOOD HUSSAIN versus NAEHA AAMER SAYED

Article 17 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application for interim maintenance, the amount of father / defendant challenged the rate of interim restitution allowance given to his daughters exceeding the status of the parties and the expenditure on education. The amount of interim restitution allowance was not high. Determining the eligibility of daughters and the provision of interim maintenance allowance will require factual investigations that cannot be investigated by the High Court in its constitutional jurisdiction. The impeachment order was mutually exclusive and temporary. Was diagnostic and could not be asked. The constitutional application in the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court was dismissed accordingly

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• SAJID ALI v. TEHSILDAR 2011 YLR 1092
• MUHAMMAD ISMAIL alias GOGA v. State 2011 MLD 1092
• TARIQ GULZAR COTTON INDUSTRIES v. ALI ZAIB KHAN TRADERS 2011 YLR 1097
• Sayyed HANAN KHALID GILLANI v. DISTRICT JUDGE/PRESIDING OFFICER, DISTRICT CONSUMER COURT, MULTAN 2011 CLD 1105
• MUHAMMAD JAMSHED alias PERVEZ v. State 2011 YLR 1110
• SHAFQAT HUSSAIN v. S.H.O. POLICE STATION TOBA TEK SINGH 2011 PCrLJ 1112
• Malik MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY 2011 CLC 1117
• MAXI INC. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2011 PTD 1117

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

top advocates from Jhatta Bhutta lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes