PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VEHARI versus NIAZ ALI
Section 10 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 163 Spec Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 The question of the cancellation of allotment land falling into the prohibited zone was allotted to the claimant but this After the order of the allotment was reviewed and the allotment was made. It was canceled by the Revenue Authorities after the revocation order was passed in the prohibited zone / municipal boundary. Detecting the officers of the breach violates the Board of Revenue's directive, which prohibits Zone boundaries should be measured. The question was present at the time of allotment, which was first 12 195 1956, when the land was actually allotted and then on 30 6 1976, when the alternative land was allotted and not when the proprietary rights were granted. No documentary film was produced, evidence to establish this question falls in the history of its original allotment or when it is in the zone of prohibition on the day the plaintiffs were allotted net land. Authorities failed to identify any illegal, irregular, jurisdictional error, misreading or non-reading of the record / evidence in the lower appellate court decision and were granted by the lower appellate court in favor of the defendants. The decree was. According to the law and no intervention was required by the High Court the amendment was rejected
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
