Find a Lawyer

MAQSOOD AHMAD versus SH. MUHAMMAD IKRAM ULLAH

Section 13 The Landlord Appeals for Their Family Based on the Owner's Default and Personally Needed Tenant Failure to Establish a Rental Shop for Employed Tenants for Their Young Children The landlord was the owner of another commercial property, and the tenant also failed to pay the monthly rent to the landlord at a better price, which the courts rightly found. The landlord's unrelated statement alone was sufficient to substantiate his justification that the tenant failed to identify any unlawful interference, misrepresentation or non-reading of evidence in illegal decisions / orders, dismissing the appeal. Done. \ r \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• MUHAMMAD FAROOQ v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE 2011 YLR 1135
• HUSSAIN BAKHSH v. NASIM MAI 2011 YLR 1141
• ALLAH YAR v. NOOR MUHAMMAD 2011 YLR 1145
• PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through District Collector, Vehari v. NIAZ ALI 2011 MLD 1149
• WASEEM SHEHZAD v. D.P.O. ATTOCK 2011 PCrLJ 1153
• AMIR SOHAIL v. T.M.A. CHAKWAL 2011 CLC 1154
• ZOHAIB HUSSAIN BANGESH v. JUDGE FAMILY COURT 2011 YLR 1155
• AFTAB AHMED v. Ch. AMJAD ZAMAN 2011 YLR 1161

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

immigration advocates contact from Hyderabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes