Articles 2 302 (b) and at 457 convictions were not designated in the FIR for allegations of morning and domestic crime or breaking the house at night. Former rivalry between the parties was recognized and in view of the said enmity, Hatchty's alleged recovery also could not be taken after three months had passed without the statements of the prosecution witnesses, suspected that during the Identity Test Parade, the complainant had identified the accused, but the complainant had not been prosecuted. While appearing as a witness, he admitted that the test parade, before the identification, had seen the accused in the police station. Jesse's officer did not deny that the two sides had a mutual affair and in the case of the accused, in the absence of a dirty face at the time of identification, it was not difficult for the prosecution witnesses. On the basis of the same evidence of the prosecution, the Teal Court had acquitted the accused, the prosecution had failed to prove the case against the accused. And that the impugned decision rendered by the trial court was based on the misrepresentation of the evidence available on the record and against all the provisions of the law recognized by the trial court for the sentencing of the accused. He was acquitted of the charge. And was ordered to be released
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
