Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD JEHANGIR

Section 29 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) Order of Compromise, keeping minor applicants aside - a request that their property be exchanged by their mother through an agreement signed by them. Was the result of fraud and misrepresentation. The mother appointed as the custodian of the property of the minor was the mother's offer to finalize the settlement after obtaining the necessary permission from the Guardian court record, which shows that the mother did not appear in court and in support of the agreement. Statement, but also the brother of the minor had made a statement regarding the transfer of property to the guardians belonging to the minors and to the disposition of the minor's property without the prior permission of the Guardian Court pursuant to section 29 of the Wards Act 1890. The guardian was unable to enter into any matter. The amnesty was passed. The terms of the Guardian Judgment Agreement have been set aside \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• MUHAMMAD IRFAN TUFAIL v. INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE 2011 PCrLJ 1384
• Ch. GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, LAHORE 2011 PLC(CS) 1384
• PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Collector Bhakkar v. MUHAMMAD IKRAM 2011 YLR 1388
• ABDUR RASHEED v. State 2011 YLR 1392
• Mirza FARHAN BAIG v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1395
• ALLAH DITTA v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION SATTO KATLA, LAHORE 2011 YLR 1401
• Dr. M.A. AMIN v. FAISALABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2011 YLR 1402
• ANJUM NIAZ CHAUDHRY v. MANAGING DIRECTOR, SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINE LIMITED 2011 MLD 1402

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

us immigration advocates from Kamber Ali Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes