PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR BHAKKAR versus MUHAMMAD IKRAM
Section 42 The case for declaration on the basis that the plaintiff was offered allotted 120 kanal of land under the settlement scheme to the interest-payer, but after receiving the full value, only 113 kanals and 14 mars total at the time of transfer of the land. The land was transferred to him. The department sued on the basis that the disputed land was not allotted to the plaintiffs because it was a possible probation trial court dismissed the appellate court's case on appeal, overturning the trial court's findings and in this case One litigated the verdict. The witnesses acknowledged that 120 kanal of land was offered in the interest of the plaintiffs and the disputed land was not allotted as it was a tragic possibility. However, the appellate court did not produce any document in support of the argument which found that in the interest of the proponents of the disputed land, it was not claimed at the time that the enclosure was possible. The Appellate Court was not appealed. In a written statement; therefore, no evidence was supported by the appellate court in support of this argument and the finding by the appellate court was in accordance with the law; the high court found nothing illegal in the unanimous decision and the appellate court's review. Petition dismissed. \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
