Section 2 302 (b) of the prosecution, appreciating the evidence, immediately punished the value of the FIR, the reduction in the FIR which was filed by the complainant without any loss, in the case of the prosecution for this purpose. The motive was not so strong and weak in the light of the prosecution's evidence, even though the prosecution's witnesses did not try to apprehend the accused, it would not mean that they did not see the incident where the complaint took place. , There was no enmity in this area. And in section 2, 34, CRPC states in its statement that at the time of the incident, the deceased was found at a questionable location with a man who was killed by the deceased's father. Could not be believed and the same piece was canceled which led to the death of the deceased was recovered upon the identification of the accused who was sent to the Cell Parcel, Chemical Examiner and Serologist's Office of Chemical Examiner Report which Shows that the human was found to have confessed that the piece of evidence confirmed the prosecution's version that there were seven victims before and after the incident. Before the cause of the injuries was made between the suspects, or what were the factors that led to the casualties, the victim was shrouded in mystery whether the incident was initiated by the accused or was not clear. On such factor, the death sentence of the accused could not be sustained. The prosecution had fully proved its case against the accused, the appeal against the sentence, in the circumstances, was rejected, but the death sentence of the accused was imprisoned. With such an amendment, the reference to murder was made in the negative
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
