Find a Lawyer

AAMIR versus STATE

Section 367A & 377 Criminal Code of Conduct (V 1898), section 345 kidnapping or abducting a person for subjecting them to unnatural lust, the definition of evidence gave a statement that they did not want to pursue the case further. They had no objection that if the defendants were acquitted after examining every aspect of the prosecution case, it was unlikely that the prosecution's reasons for the trial were likely to succeed. The accused also had no weight. The accused was charged and the question was whether the compromise could be a non-controversial offense, the purpose of the compromise was to live harmoniously and maintain a cordial relationship between the parties. Became worse and their appeal was allowed accordingly

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• ASIF MEHMOOD BUTT v. REGIONAL CEO, NBP 2011 PLC(CS) 1462
• MUHAMMAD BASHIR v. YASEEN 2011 CLC 1464
• MUHAMMAD BAKHSH v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1466
• SHERA v. NAZIR AHMAD 2011 YLR 1467
• GULZAR AHMED v. ADDITIONAL INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE 2011 YLR 1471
• SAMIA BIBI v. ABDUL HAMEED 2011 CLC 1471
• Syed TAMTARRAQ MOHSAN SHAH v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SAHIWAL 2011 MLD 1473
• QURBAN HUSSAIN v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2011 PLC(CS) 1473

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

top advocates from Harnai lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes