Article 2 (b) and Q 83 of the coronary martyrdom (of 1984 of the ten), Article (46 (2)) by Qatil Ahmed immediately ased by the administration of poison, admits the evidence that he prosecuted the matter. Two witnesses, who had no animosity or no complaint, against the accused, who was concerned under Article 46 (1) of the Sha Shaidah Act, 1984, had a special procedure for declaring death under the law. There was no need, which could be made orally or in writing to anyone, the investigating officer himself recorded the death. According to chemical testing and post-mortem reports, the deceased had a complaint They were informed when the facts were stated, in which the deceased identified the suspect who poisoned him in alcohol. The victim's blood, urine and viscera revealed that strong medical evidence and prosecution evidence The deceased's declaration before the death of the victim was fully confirmed, therefore, based on a proper assessment of the evidence, the trial court's death attributed it to the death of the deceased. The suspect was over the age of 13/2 at the time of the incident and it can be considered sensible to understand the consequences. Due to his act, and therefore he was not entitled to the benefit of Section 83, the PPC case was not of sudden provocation and the accused left his place after disputing and intensifying the matter, taking poisonous material. Had come and administered fraud. The accused was also sentenced to life imprisonment. The gravity of the crime was that the appeal was dismissed in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
