Sections 2 302, 4 324 and 6 346 of attempted murder, secretly held in wrongful detention, testimony defendant allegedly committed the murder of the victim's complainant and her husband in the room After digging they were asleep. A piece of cloth and pieces of cloth were thrown through this hole by throwing a hole and kerosene into the ceiling of the room. The deceased complainant named the suspect and his accompanying accomplice in the hospital statement and was included in the FIR, but it is suspected that the person found through the roof hole of the suspect was on fire. After the ability to disclose their excavation, noise could be heard during the excavation by the accused, four eyewitnesses sleeping on a nearby roof raised the question as to why the eyewitness presented by the prosecution did so. ? Do not act to break the lock immediately before the deceased is burned alive. The prosecutor alleged that the accused had committed an offense against the deceased, his real brother, in favor of the deceased, who had acquired the land by his father But there was no documentary evidence to establish the allegation, which alone was not substantiated by the testimony of the prosecutor's testimony, which was stopped by the testimony of two other eyewitnesses. had gone. And the prosecuting medical officer did not present him as a witness to prove that the complainant was capable of recording the statement, nor did the investigating officer's statement reveal that he received the medical officer's opinion The trial court did not interpret the evidence in this regard. Properly complainant o
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
