Sections 39 and 48 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), section 44 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), section 12 [as amended by the Amended Act (Amendment) Act (XIII of 1991]], dissolve in partnership, The trial of the accounts proposal and appointment was given by the trial court, which was rejected by the trial court, after which the appeal was dismissed on time, in which case the order was not approved on the same day as it was approved. But it was withdrawn after about a month and a half with the approval of the same application. The copy was filed by the defendant to the agency seeking the order, 12 days after its approval, the defendant was not given any notice or notice that the copy of the order had been prepared May be obtained from the claimant obtained from the copying agency. More than 3 months after filing the application for the acquisition and the defendant filed a copy of the order approximately 13 days after its acquisition, which was dismissed due to time-limited appeal. ??? Under Section 12 of the Limitation Act 1908, the period required for obtaining certified copies was to start from the date of application and to count till the date of delivery, which the copying agency would have to inform or inform. ? In the present case of the applicant regarding the preparation of a certified copy, there was no material before the Appellate Court to obtain information that the defendant had been given any information or information that the copy of the decision and decree after the period and deduction. Ready to deliver. From the date of the filing of the application for the acquisition of certified copy till the supply of copies, the appeal filed by the defendant will be limited.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
