Find a Lawyer

AKBAR KHAN versus MUHAMMAD DIN

For the specific performance of a contract to sell a Section 12 trial trial court, the appellate court dismissed the lawsuit as exempt. Defending his version of his refusal to receive the gift, the defendants initiated a plea bargain with the Tehsildar, and his Reader Tehsildar issued a court order on the request but made no record of it. Neither the sub-registrar, upon receipt of the petition, made the mockery of the law by making a false statement in the lower courts, which should have been prosecuted because they had to act responsibly as public record watchers. Should have Doubts were ultimately set aside by the subordinate courts, the plaintiff's suit was subject to the remainder of the sale price within a month \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• MUHAMMAD YOUSAF v. A.S.J. 2011 YLR 131
• PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Executive Engineering v. AMMICO CONSTRUCTION (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE 2011 MLD 135
• TARIQ AHMAD FAROOQI v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE 2011 YLR 138
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. State 2011 PCrLJ 140
• Syed MUHAMMAD ABBAS NAQVI v. State 2011 MLD 144
• Hafiz BILAL AHMAD v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION 18-HAZARI, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT JHANG 2011 PLD 145
• Mst. SAADIA YAQOOB v. M. KHALID KARIM 2011 CLC 146
• MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE v. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL 2011 PLD 149

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

female advocates from Khuzdar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes