Sections 302 (b), 324 and 337f (i) Efforts to compel Khalit, Ghith Jafah Qalat, praise witnesses The witnesses who suspect the real brother of one of the four victims made many reforms. There were. In his statement, which was the subject of many contradictions, and did not state the reason for his presence at the time of the incident, the other witness, who was injured in the incident, in his statement filed under Section 161, CR P.C. The accused was not named but he was named chief in the chief executive without revealing the source of his information. Such dishonest reforms and contradictions cannot be ignored, which made the testimony of witnesses credible. Was declared when a witness did not designate and identify the suspect during the investigation. His statement through the Identity Parade in the court would then require strong coordination, which did not take place under the prosecution's declaration. In the case of G. fugitives, the defendants were not strictly in accordance with the law, even otherwise, in the presence of a credible and trustworthy affidavit, most of the accused's fugitive proceedings could be considered a piece of evidence, which Was required in this case. The perpetrator of the accused could not be retained on his felony alone because since the testimony did not encourage trust, the medical evidence had no benefit to the prosecution, which would only explain the injured seats, The way it was caused and the weapons used, but will not reveal the names of the attackers.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
