Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMJAD versus CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Article 199 Constitutional petition Petitioner, a deaf and dumb man, was chosen by the authorities as an assistant lineman but was subsequently refused to post due to his disability, as a postal consideration. Was unfair and illegal. Any objection to the posting of the applicant should have been known at an early stage that the applicant's disability was not of the kind that could be suppressed. The option to interview can reject the applicant at the time of interview. Once the applicant was selected in the interview, the authorities could not refuse the posting. The request was allowed; the authorities were required to issue a posting order to the applicant. Was directed to \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• Malik NAZEER HUSSAIN v. SESSIONS JUDGE, LAHORE 2011 YLR 1021
• MIRZA IRFAN v. MUHAMMAD YAQOOB 2011 MLD 1024
• GHULAM HUSSAIN v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MULTAN 2011 YLR 1025
• ASIF RIZWAN v. State 2011 YLR 1031
• MUHAMMAD ZAFFAR SHAH v. State 2011 MLD 1032
• SHAZANA KOUSAR v. DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, RAWALPINDI 2011 PLC(CS) 1040
• Mst. REHANA REHMAN v. FAMILY JUDGE 2011 CLC 1040
• NASEER AHMAD v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1040

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

top civil advocates from Risalpur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes