Section 15 and 22 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution affirming interim order, Renewal Affidavit, the Tribunal granted leave to defend the case on tenant's plea beyond the ten-day statutory period. ? Along with any affidavit taken by the tenant, it was held that the constitutional petition against the interim order was not maintainable, though the constitutional petition against the interim order by the special court was not sustained, but it was not an absolute rule, And the facts of each case were important. Considering proceedings to determine the question of maintaining the constitutional petition, the Rent Tribunal had taken action against the mandatory supply of law, which had to be examined at an early stage rather than waiting for the final order to be approved. If there was a process of not checking the interim orders at the appropriate stages. Wasted no time which would lead to a wastage of public time and, in addition, to delay the filing of the matter between the parties in the case of filing a petition, to allow the court to fight on the eviction request. Before that fact should have been taken into account, none of the courts had the jurisdiction to extend the period for ten days. Filing of leave application Thus the court took full action against the essential provisions of section 22 (2) of the Punjab Rated Premises Act, 2009; the tenant did not file an affidavit with his application for leave and the law This was needed for the purpose of implementing such a supply. The tenant has to prepare a ground to fight the eviction request and if the court
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
