Section 2 (2 (b)) and at e am Qutel Excellent, the value of the evidence The eye witnesses were very natural witnesses as a resident of the Dera incident and their presence at the scene cannot be suspected. The full details of the accused were also proven to be repeatedly beating the deceased and the injured woman due to the presence of the injured witness on the spot at the relevant time, while she did not take her injuries while rescuing her injured brother. The attack on the witness who was injured, due to both injuries, corresponded to every material point related to the role of the accused. Was used and the identity of the accused ocular account by both eyewitnesses, who had nothing to falsely accuse the accused, were straightforward and reliable allegations and the witnesses were already close to each other. Well aware of the relationship and the close living allegations, Ed had to stay close to the deceased and injured witness when he suffered a minor injury when the identity of the accused was not open to any suspects during the time the witnesses were exposed to the moonlight. As was alleged in the FIR and witnesses mentioned it. The cross-examination was not challenged by the defense in court, it would be believed that they were confessed by the accused, medical evidence spiked the ocular version recovered from the human blood-stained accused. The full account of the accused's account was not supported by the defendant's real sister, nor did he and his son, who could add to the crime, come forward to rescue the accused.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
