Section Q Qunununununun ehadhadhadhad (((((((((((((((10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10) Ar Ar Ar Ar Ar Ar Ar Ar Ar Ar Ar Ar Ar Ar Ar Ar Ar Ar Ar Ar Arific Artificial Artificial Artificial Array Artificial Array Artificial Array Artifact Artifact Artifact Artifact Artifact Artifact Artifact Artifact Array gift gift gift gift gift gift gift gift gift gift gift gift gift gift gift gift gift gift gift gift gift gift gift gift gift gift gift gift gift mut mut gift gift at at at at at at at at at at at at at at at at at at at at at at at at at at at at Attempt by court and lower appellate court for fraud and misrepresentation in favor of his brothers Dismissed the suit and appeal filed by the plaintiff. ?Due to fraud or misrepresentation, the burden is always on the person who claims to take advantage of any transaction. No speculation of the truth was linked to the mutation, and especially when it was alleged by one side that it was the result of fraud and misrepresentation, by examining the defendant / beneficiary witnesses as well as the revenue. Variations prove that for this purpose, although defendants claim that the gift mutations were confirmed by the tax authorities in accordance with the law, the truth concerning the mutation was admissible and the gift presented. Any evidence on record regarding the supply of land occupied in conflict as well as confession Was not present. Defendant's affirmation of the change and subsequent preparation of such record on the basis of such change did not prove the delivery of possession to the High Court under the jurisdiction under which the two courts
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
