Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 392 robbery guarantee, grant of further investigation suspect was not named in the FIR. He was already arrested in another case and during the arrest in the said case he disclosed committing a robbery, it cannot be called an important piece of evidence to link to such crime, FI There were no details or details of the three robbers in the R. About 93 days after the incident, during the identification parade, the complainant, who was not an eyewitness, identified the suspect's alleged involvement in the case, and did not deny the delay in the identification parade. can go. The currency was mentioned in the FIR, recovery of the money after 93 days of the incident, it would be a matter of proof and after recording the evidence, his sanction would be seen in the trial which was alleged. Had been behind bars for a long time, which was unjustified. Seven months and no further investigation required No further trial and no trial was in sight. Keeping the accused in jail indefinitely, will not serve any useful purpose. To the accused who is in the scope of further inquiry, Bail was granted in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
