Find a Lawyer

NASRULLAH versus STATE

Section 412 dishonestly receiving stolen property in the commission of a robbery FIR of appreciation of evidence was filed after two days of delay The complainant was introducing a new set of offenders through his subsequent additional statements Evidence regarding the retrieval of stolen articles from the court was very unpleasant on many material aspects, such as identifying it by the investigating officer, being similar to the case property in court and the prosecution's witnesses even identifying it. And his accompanying accomplice was also brought to the scene of recovery and in the same van the restoration effect S recovery was the same village, there are contradictions in the evidence of the confidence inspired by the deadly conflicts and recovery record of the evidence against the accused had notice of appeal from the court charge. He was acquitted

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• FAZAL ELAHI v. KAMAL DIN 2011 YLR 1177
• FAISAL v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1178
• LIAQAT ALI v. ADDITIONAL INSPECTOR GENERAL POLICE (INVESTIGATION BRANCH), PUNJAB 2011 MLD 1179
• SAFDAR ALI v. MEMBER (REVENUE), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE 2011 YLR 1183
• MUHAMMAD ARSHAD v. State 2011 MLD 1187
• QADAR DAD v. MUHAMMAD ANSAR 2011 YLR 1189
• Dr. JAVED HAIDER v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2011 PLC(CS) 1190
• NIZAM DIN v. MUHAMMAD ALI 2011 YLR 1193

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

immigration advocates email from Daur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes