Implementation of Article XXI, R 10 and Section 47 Implementation Court Order issued a warrant of occupation against the accused persons on the ground that the right of the petitioners to the High Court has been finalized and even If it is believed that one of the partners sold their share in the disputed property, the decision to the extent of the remaining land was processed. The appellate court dismissed the appeal against the order passed by the applicable court. The heirs argued that they were partners in the disputed property and that the decree was not enforceable. Unless a decree of partition was approved, the creditors of the legality were guilty and the decree was to be leveled against them for the possession of the disputed land of the legal heritage unless a decree of partition was approved. Of course, the decree was not entitled to any property owned by the creditors of the judgment. The legal heirs could not claim that the defendants were present. Their property was sued by the legal heirs for their own distribution. In the sense that they have confessed that they are co-conspirators in every inch of the standing executive court, The order to expunge the verdicts of the judgment was properly approved. The court
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
