FAZLI HAKEEM versus SECRETARY STATE AND FRONTIER REGIONS DIVISION ISLAMABAD
Section 5 (1) Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 3 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) Federal Service Tribunal, Order of Order not passed in accordance with law, promoted to priority employee of the scope of employment Improvements have been made Regular employees against the law admit respondents that the current application should be dismissed on the basis of limitations. The Accuracy Respondent was a temporary contract employee and when he was developing he was working as if the question is how the Respondent can be a senior and how can he prioritize employees who were previously regularized? Were either not answered in the Service Tribunal's unanimous decision or the respondent present case was not a case where the matter could be kept calm by summoning the provisions. Managing the Limitations The courts did not have to understand that by examining the specifics of an act, the court should maintain what was unfair and unfair. Acting against the law and thus the courts should find ways and means to eliminate unfair and injustice, even where the question of limitation, if at all, hinders the fair decision of the case, It should be viewed from such an angle. In this case, before the service tribunal the dispute of view was emphasized and the decision was not made in its proper context, the remand of the present case is inevitable, therefore, the appeal for leave to appeal was changed. , Set aside his unclean decision. The service tribunal and the service tribunal after the case sent the law for a first decision
