Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/34 assassination bail, was based on testimony of the circumstances of the grant of the prosecution case, and its co-accused allegedly called to apologize to the prosecution's witnesses. And jointly confessed his guilt. Prior to this, such extra-judicial confession was not yet confirmed by the trial court's Wajitkar witnesses and the final evidence, although closely related to the complainant, did not immediately reveal the fact and Kept complaining for several days. The statements did not disclose the names of the witnesses, and instead of making their names a source of information, they relied on the firm's conviction to get the accused involved in the case that the inappropriate evidence was weak. Was, which may have been easily procured by the prosecution, where further evidence could not be reached, demanding further investigation of the crime within the scope of the accused. Section 497 (2), CR PC and accordingly it was admitted on bail
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
