Section 516A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 395/342 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Duty, Fake Detention of Tractor Trolley Vehicle Spreads Given to Defendant by Sessions Court, Arrested by the Applicant I arrived, the applicant allegedly snatched the complainant from, the applicant accused documenting the alleged robbery filed against the applicant, the document regarding the purchase of the tractor trolley FIR. Failed to produce evidence, the controversial vehicle was his last possession. Help him If the basis of the last seizure by the applicant was considered to be the only basis for the interim custody of the vehicle, all the accused involved in theft, robbery and robbery cases will claim superannuation on the recovery of vehicle rights issue. And will have the money to thwart criminal proceedings initiated against such accused and license them to commit such crimes and to frustrate the law against which the theft has been alleged. The person could not be given the vehicle's superdriver, the respondent obtained the tractor trolley through documentary evidence. Had set up his property, in the name of the order passed by the civil court to the applicant made it clear that it would not affect any court proceedings pending between the parties but upon the respondent's supremacy. The improper order of giving the vehicle was not excluded in the constitutional petition in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
