Section 13 (6) rent controller Landlord's jurisdiction, asserting that the monthly rent rate is Rs 46,948 while the tenant claims his monthly rent of Rs 17,716 but the tenant controller has The temporary rent was estimated at Rs 30,000 monthly and the same was deposited. The tenant approved the eviction order without determining the arrears and rates of rent by the tenant, which the lower appellate court maintained, at the request of the tenant, the rental controller ordered that the deposit be collected through The maximum amount to be refunded was the responsibility of the rent. The decision to remove the controller's rent controller to determine the arrears of rent did not become a function of the decision after the withdrawal request decision, with no further inquiry as to withdraw more rent. Determination of rent arrears takes place, as the lower appellate court did not legalize the rent controller, but was not accepted and rejected by the owner's appeal. Note that the rent controller was not ultimately decided by the rent controller and the lower appellate court order needs to be amended to such an extent that the high court requires the lower appellate court order that the rent controller be properly inquired. Will determine rent arrears after. The rental controller was remanded in this case and under this case
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
