In section 426 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), section 302 (b) Qatiel AMD, in his statement under section 342, applied for the suspension of the accused, CR PC stated that the victim had committed physical punishment And since he resisted, the deceased attacked. He struggled with the dagger, but in the dispute that resulted, the victim suffered an injury that eventually led to his death. The accused further stated that he had escaped from the incident and afterwards surrendered himself to the police authorities saying that the accused's statement was not affected. The trust suffered a serious injury with a dead dagger that went deep into his body. The same injury was going to the victim's body; he could not be tolerated if he was clinging to the accused and they were both very close. Would have been. The two witnesses who were close to each other immediately transferred the deceased to the hospital with the complainant. The eyewitnesses had no previous hostility to the accused and would not move. E was wrongly dismissed against him, the accused had committed a felony, with serious injury to the dagger; no person could be allowed as a matter of fact on bail, after which he After committing a vicious crime, he committed the crime. The recording of the conviction, the status of an accused has changed and should not be suspended after the trial court's verdict when it appears to be unlawfully unlawful or by mistake of the prosecution. Do not be the basis for suspending the sentence given to an accused. There is no detailed examination of the evidence and only a temporary review of the evidence was made which led to the dismissal of the application.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
