VITA PAKISTAN LIMITED THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, FIA
Sections 2 (e), 1 (2) and 5 (5) of the Special Relief Act (Constitution of 1877), Section 12 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Suits Criminal Procedure of the Federal Investigation Agency for the Special Performance Scope Petitioner Challenged the start of The Federal Investigation Agency, upon approval of the civil suit, claimed that the provisions of section 2 (e) of the Federal Investigation Agency Act of 1974 were not attracted to private limited companies, which the applicant company and the Government of Pakistan Petitioner companies were overwhelmed by the collusion of the relevant department to the Federal Investigation Agency to investigate the specific performance filed by the applicant company under the agreement that was pending before the civil court and Reality disputes were involved in this matter and the matter could not be resolved A. In its constitutional jurisdiction, the decision of the bidding process by the Purchasing Committee of the High Court can be recorded through evidence which cannot be taken by the High Court, especially when the matter is before the Civil Court. And the criminal prosecution could go along with the Federal Investigation Agency Act. , 1974 was not applicable to civil servants but under section 1 (2) of the Federal Investigation Agency Act, 1974, the Federal Investigation Agency was empowered on all citizens of Pakistan to apply for section 5 (5) of the applicant company. Will investigate the federal for fraud investigation. The Investigation Agency Act, 1974 gave the Inquiry Officer / Member of the Federal Investigation Agency the power to overrule the property.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
