Schedule for the recovery of section 5 and Dover in which his mother-in-law's contract to act on the document registered to be owned by his father-in-law by his father-in-law as a contract one day before his marriage. Is mentioned in column 16 of the denial of. According to the terms of this agreement, the father-in-law accused the wife of her husband and father-in-law for the specific performance of his contract, that such agreement and columns should be forged and fabricated. Presented and examined the minor evidence of this agreement. It was evident that the marriage was arranged and in pursuance of this, the father-in-law had executed such an agreement with his own free will. Such an agreement is a comprehensive reflection of the consensus between the two families. According to the husband, there was no property, according to one, the hand of the plaintiff for the son transferred a part of his house to him which was valued at Rs 50,000. In the event of a failure of law, the plaintiff had the right to enforce it through a court of law. Tkt admitted his wife had proved such an agreement, the witness said. The in-laws could produce evidence of alleged interference in the marriage by producing a certified copy of it, but they did not know it well enough that during cross-examination there was no obstruction in the law which acknowledged that all the marriages of the bride. Empty columns were crossed, while column 16 was filled in and crossed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
