R6 (c) Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 intra-court allowing appeal of a single High Court Judge to the Tehsil Municipal Officer in question to the present respondent for the installation of CNG station in the residents. The certificate was instructed to issue. The accuracy of the area was not intra-court appeals, first-hand, however important, however, the single judge did not offer the appellant any opportunity to file reports and comments on the contents of the constitutional petition or to present any case. Order passed. The same Syed petition was presented to the judge in the Chamber on 20 7 2009, a notice was issued for the 23rd 2009, which reached telephony without a copy of the petition and on 23 7 2009 the CNG station in an area Permitting theory was approved In the city's densely populated area, more than one canal and two marshals could not be reconciled. The CNG station has its own dangers that need to be taken care of. The Punjab Land Use (Classification, Rehabilitation and Re-development) Rules, 2009, was also not considered during the approval of the non-hearing order, without resorting to the departmental remedies provided under the said rules, without the High Court. The constitutional jurisdiction has jumped in. The disputed order was approved which resulted in the appellant being instructed to dissolve the applicant's request and to make a decision within 15 days if such order was not in favor of the respondent / applicant. If so, he should file an appeal before the department officials. The rules that must be decided in 30 days are the intra-court appeals
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
