Plaintiffs, sections 16 and 20 for display of accounts claiming compensation / damages due to defendants' losses and losses caused by defendants, spanned a period of 40 years; In the absence of jurisdiction and retained trial on illegal grounds, the trial court upheld the defendants' claim that they were citizens of a foreign country, disputed property located outside the country (Pakistan). And the above-mentioned property has also received disposable income / profit / interest abroad. You demanded them. There is no territorial jurisdiction on this subject The defendants of the validity were foreign nationals, the disputed property was abroad, the dispute which was raised from 1962 to 1973, was also obtained in the foreign country. The final settlement of the account between the parties resulted in the split of the disputed property between the two. And further acceptance of the settlement account by the foreign court was unauthorized and the final position was granted that the Pakistani courts had no jurisdiction to allow the High Court to appeal the costs and decide the trial decision and the decree. Set aside
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
