KANWAR ISHTIAQ AHMAD KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY
Chapter II Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 25 and 199 Maintaining the Constitution Request Terms of Service and Terms of Service Policy Scope The applicant was an employee of the solicitor department as well as the District Attorney and his complaint was that he was an employee of the Judicial Allowance. Were also entitled. It was the government's policy to deny the validity grant or any special allowance of the High Court which could not be interfered with by the High Court under constitutional jurisdiction. The applicants came under the administrative control of the Punjab Government, while the employees of the High Court were not in administrative control. ? The Punjab government, as there was no discrimination against the applicants, kept the applicants and the employees of the High Court under two different organs of the state under different management because the High Court was an independent constitutional body Had the authority to determine the terms and conditions. While his empire was in force, the terms and conditions of service, including salaries and allowances, were being regulated under the Punjab Civil Servants Act 1974 in the case of the applicants and their colleagues in the solicitor's office and the constitutional applications made thereunder. Because salaries and allowances have declined substantially. Government employee refuses to interfere in the matter under the terms and conditions of the High Court in exercising constitutional jurisdiction
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
