Prior to the arrest due to Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), sections 337 F (i), (v), 148 and 149 dementia and harassment, further inquiries were filed in this case with an extraordinary 17 days delay. , For which no plausible explanation was provided. The ocular account contradicts the medical evidence. It also cannot be ruled out that the complainant has filed a false FIR on the basis of the affidavit against the accused, a witness in the prosecution had submitted his statement and supported the prosecution version. Did not The offense charged against the accused does not fall under the prohibition clause of Section 497, CRPC. And it could not be ascertained that out of the eight accused named in the FIR, which caused a fracture on the complainant's arm, such fact also made the case of the accused that after further investigation, the accused was already in favor. Bail bail pre-arrest bail granted, conditions confirmed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
