FOTILE KITCHEN AND HOME APPLIANCES versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Section 25, 25A, 25 D & 194 A Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application Pricing decisions were presented by alternative and effective alternatives that the importers also provided under Section 25D of the Customs Act, 1969 Had benefited from the alternative treatment provided, therefore, the request was not appropriate. Where a party has taken legal action against the order, then the constitutional petition could not be abandoned or dismissed, without any reasonable and reasonable purpose, challenging the same action, leaving the importers satisfied. Failed to show that there was any legitimate and appropriate application for a High Court filed by the importers before the review / appellate authorities to abandon or ignore the proceedings and file an Iron Petition, and this law I was not intact because an alternative and effective way was available to the importers Was first raised by the benefit. The High Court concealed the material facts and had more before the Appellate Tribunal of the Customs Appeal filed without the leave of the High Court.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015
