SYED RIAZ HAIDER versus FRONTIER CORE CONSTABULARY FOUNDATION TRUST
O VII, R 11 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 39, 42 and 54 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 3 and Article 91 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Section 454 of the Law on Evidence (1984) 10), Article 100 suit, application for dismissal of original documents, cancellation of documents, permanent injunction and removal of suit filed before the High Court for dismissal. VI, R 11, was filed on different grounds under CPC, in which the case was filed. Beyond the threshold, the plaintiffs were well aware of the implementation of the lease deed, as well as other relevant documents, which they consciously chose to file a constitutional petition for the execution of the lease deed. What it had tried to do was to cancel the document, instead of claiming that the document was canceled, even without the necessary party imposing it. About the heirs Plain Effect Suite was banned for seven years, ten months and sixteen days. Claim rejected for time restriction.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015
