Sections 302 (b), 324, 337 F (iii), 337 F (i) and 337 L (2) Qtl e amd, admission of testimony of evidence came in broad daylight, the accused was nominated a The complainant's son was killed in a special role FIR and the complainant's grandson was injured by the shooting of the complainant presented by the complainant and despite the long cross-examination, the injured witness was restless and the story of the prosecutor. Was not harmed. The alternatives authorized by the accused were not confirmed on the record, which negated the self-defense version, failure to prove motive was not fatal to the prosecution The FIR was recorded without delay. However, despite the confession of the suspects who opened fire at the scene, the investigating officer neither recovered the crime blanks from the scene, nor sent the crime weapon recovered to the Franz Science Laboratory for report. Showed his disrespect. ty In view of such conduct and investigation procedures, it was not surprising to have the accused declared innocent by the police The site plan was not an important piece of evidence and the draftsman was not an eyewitness, between the distance. The difference, as listed in the FIR and the plan was not fatal in the case of the prosecution. I considered the decision as good reason and it was in accordance with the law and the facts in this case and kept the accused guilty in the circumstances. had gone.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
