RASHEED MASIH versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/COLLECTOR SIALKOT
Section Plaintiffs Plaintiff filed a lawsuit for a permanent injunction as well as claiming that they had been in possession of the disputed property for three generations, and the defendants claimed that the disputed property belonged to the Christie community but under the plaintiff's case. That's what they want to capture. Current trial trial court dismisses plaintiffs' claim Appeal court upholds trial and decision Prosecution has the right to dispute that the disputed land is located in population Dida and no record has been maintained in respect of settlement village Because the relevant record was misunderstood. For example, with the Axis population and the Shijra population in Patwari as well as being in President Kanigo's office, both the courts below confirmed that the control of the plaintiffs had ended and that the disputed land was owned by the Christian community. I was unsuccessful. High court dismisses application for illegal, weak or jurisdictional error in judgments and review of decree
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
