Section 5, Schedule and Section 14 (2) (c) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Restitution and Recovery of Dowry Articles Suit, Family Court Order Appeal barred by Applicable Appeal Court at the time of appeal Increased Court Restoration Rate Claims filed by the plaintiff claiming that the appellate court's decision is the result of wrongful exercise of jurisdiction because under section 14 (2) (c) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, Appeal was barred by a family court's decision to restore Rs 1,000. The validity was applied every month, except for section 14 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, where a restraining order was challenged to withdraw the holder of the decree or to reduce the rate of reinstatement allowance. And it did not even apply to the plaintiff's extension of restitution. The appeal was obliged to maintain, therefore, the defendant's strong financial position was misconstrued by his gifts to his second wife, otherwise, the father legally obliged to retain his children. The appellate court had rightly increased the rate of rehabilitation the constitutional application was dismissed accordingly \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
