ALLAMA IQBAL OPEN UNIVERSITY THROUGH VICE-CHANCELLOR versus IRFAN BOOTA
Section 2 (c) (k), 25 and 28 u Consumer \ `Services \ Meaning and Scope Consumer Court awarded a Complainant / Student Rs 20,000 which was declared by the University to be unsuccessful because of its assignment. According to the complainant, as a student, the complainant, as a student, was not sent to the Controller of the University by the student, it was not the user specified by clause (c) of section 2 of the Punjab Consumer Protection Act, 2005 That the services provided by the University are also not included in the provision of k services. Punjab Consumer Protection Act, 2005, Validity University was an educational institution and could not be defined as a commercial activity, under which services for the term user term in clause (c) of section 2 of the Punjab Consumer Protection Act, 2005 Was considering hiring. A deliberation and appreciation of the matter was not applicable wherein a student had submitted an application for any examination, neither an educational institution nor a student appearing for the examination conducted by the University. `User 'cannot be defined as as defined in Section 2 (c) of the Punjab Consumer Protection Act, 2005, nor was the University considered as a" Service Provider ". The complaint filed by the students under section 2 (k) of the Punjab Consumer Protection Act, 2005 was not disputed by the consumer court and the appeal was accepted and the unclean order was put aside \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
