Section 2 (2 (b), 201 Q4 and 2Q), the motive set by the complainant for the murder, kidnapping for murder, the disappearance of evidence of the crime was merely vague and could not be proved by the witnesses. For the last eleven days, by the last witnesses, the authenticity of their evidence was clearly reflected not only for their statements, but also for the prosecution case as a whole, dead despite the testimony of the witnesses mentioned above. No action was taken to save his life, so much that he confessed that he had not shown the police the last place of inquiry during the interrogation, the final witnesses said. The statements regarding the plea of the witnesses were nothing but thought and conclusion. Medical evidence can only state the number and nature of the casualties, the type of weapon used for such injuries and other details. The author of the aforementioned injuries was not of the utmost importance and relevance in the case, no crime was recovered from the scene of the incident, the recovery of a pistol at the scene of the accused and the forensic science. Laboratory report was also included. There was no help in the prosecution's case, the prosecution failed to establish a proven series of cases, one of which ended up in the neck of the accused, leaving all assumptions on his other end. The evidence of the prosecution already existed. During the acquittal of the co-accused, the trial court denied and the accused's case was in no way distinguishable from that of the co-accused. The impeachment decision was based on mere speculations and limitations which put these circumstances aside.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
