Cases 42 and 54 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 115 Suit Title for Defamation of Declaration of Counterfeit Transaction Plaintiff asserts that Defendant defended the suit land by transferring forgeries from the accuracy record and the statements of the parties. It has been proven that the plaintiff is appointed with his independent lawyer, who is appointed general attorney. For another person the land was more alien and the same to the plaintiff's knowledge. The exchange was further transferred to the plaintiff by the attorney general, who was a relative of the lease, and the two had a cordial relationship with the plaintiff. The plaintiff's confession that the power of attorney was fraudulent, false statement. And was hanged as a result of hiding the truth. The case filed by the plaintiff without any foundation was conclusive and the judgment and judgment passed by the lower appellate court were based on words and speculations that were the result of reading the false news and not reading the evidence because the court The court failed to appreciate the evidence filed. Following the amended jurisdiction, the trial court was reinstated, setting aside the judgment and order passed by the lower appellate court, allowing for review of the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
