Section 2302 (b) appreciating the evidence, signed the evidence primarily against Wajitkar, which was presented by another complainant and the prosecution witness, who held the gun in his hand. Was seen leaving the place. The witnesses saw the accused firing at the description given by the two witnesses to be suppressed at the site, were not credible, as their testimony was not only full of contradictions and contradictions. There were also untrustworthy, controversial and unnatural prosecutions that failed to prove the motive, as the complainant had previously stated before the investigating officer, medical evidence could establish the number and type of evidence used in the crime. Weapons and other particulars are also available, but the author has not been identified. The crime scene is vacant from the location of the injured victim, who was not sent to forensic science. To match the gun recovered from the laboratory suspect, the gun was not used in the forensic science lab's crime report. The utility and its boredom were shown, the prosecutor's case failed to proceed. In any way, the accused against the accused was acquitted under the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
