Sections 13 (2) (i), (3) (ii) and 15 on the basis of default in payment of rent and personal well-being, the tenant's termination removal application was simultaneously accepted by the Rent Controller and the Court of Appeal. The tenants had fully proved that the tenant had not ruled the landlord and tenant relationship between the parties and the tenancy agreement between the parties was a genuine one. Was proved as a tenant, in which regard the personal need of the landlord was denied In the claim it is claimed that Maka The owner was the owner of many other shops, the tenant's choice was stopped because the landlord owned the land. The landlord clearly stated that the landlord was not related to the landlord because of his personal need. By the tenant, who has consolidated the conclusions of the two courts below, by the deliberate default of several tenants for admission and the personal need of the law. With regard to the shop under question, interference cannot be made when the lawyer for the tenant failed to identify an invalid order or invalid scope.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
